{"id":656,"date":"2010-06-18T08:21:36","date_gmt":"2010-06-18T13:21:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/?p=656"},"modified":"2010-06-19T09:32:53","modified_gmt":"2010-06-19T14:32:53","slug":"everything-is-illuminated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/2010\/06\/everything-is-illuminated\/","title":{"rendered":"Everything is Illuminated"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>15 June 2010<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Today we attended the child birth class again. At one point, one of the instructors held up a graph. It had the typical X and Y axes, and it had a linearly rising line. She said the name of the graph, which I promptly forgot, but explained that it&#8217;s a plotting of how most in the medical community like to see labor progress; essentially, 1 centimeter of dialation per hour. She explained that if a laboring woman is not progressing this fast, they might send her back home (at best) or start in with the interventions (at worst) because, you know, something&#8217;s not normal.<\/p>\n<p>As much as <a href=\"http:\/\/graphjam.files.wordpress.com\/2008\/07\/funny-graphs-love-shack.gif\">I like graphs <\/a>, I was pleased when the instructor said that, while the graph&#8217;s creators had good intentions, it&#8217;s pretty much worthless. She went on to explain how laboring, instead of following a linear development, is more like traveling a labyrinth. Sometimes, you think you&#8217;re getting close, but you&#8217;re not. Sometimes, you&#8217;re surprised at the progress you&#8217;re making.\u00a0 Jennifer said that this made sense, because she went from 3 to 10 centimeters in 2 and a half hours, and the hospital staff treated her as if something was going wrong.\u00a0 Instead, though, Jennifer was just taking her own unique route to the goal.<\/p>\n<p>I can&#8217;t really say I didn&#8217;t know this before, but it was nice to have it so clearly spelled out, especially by someone in the know. It kind of reminds me of when I read chapter 4 of <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/imgres?imgurl=http:\/\/ecx.images-amazon.com\/images\/I\/41K6D1WD72L._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Film-Art-Bruce-H-Hinrichs\/dp\/0966011120&amp;usg=__P8LV4On1PTBORFowYaq47wKDasM=&amp;h=300&amp;w=300&amp;sz=17&amp;hl=en&amp;start=1&amp;sig2=ZlqZFS54CggQQcnwyX36GA&amp;itbs=1&amp;tbnid=kGc7VdbLQeI9GM:&amp;tbnh=116&amp;tbnw=116&amp;prev=\/images%3Fq%3Dfilm%2Band%2Bart%2Bhinricks%26hl%3Den%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&amp;ei=B2cbTP-fEYXqM5Xz3KQF\">Film and Art<\/a><\/em>, or chapter one of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Peoples-History-United-States-1492-Present\/dp\/0060528370\"><em>A People&#8217;s History of the United States<\/em><\/a>. Yes, I know those are odd examples, but those are two of my favorite books, and, in both cases, I found myself nodding along with the words, thinking &#8220;yes, I intuitively knew this to be true, thanks so much for laying it out so plainly.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>16 June 2010<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Today we recieved, via US mail, the title for our car. I opened it up, stared at it half-mindedly for about a second, then carried it into our bedroom to put in our file cabinet. As I stared at it, though, I saw my name. My whole name.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, I&#8217;ve seen my whole name before. In fact, for a time, I quite liked it. I used it a lot. Especially since I share a first and last name with my Dad, I emphasized my middle name to distinguish myself from him.<\/p>\n<p>But that&#8217;s the thing: no part of my name is uniquely mine. My first name is from my Dad, my middle name is from my maternal grandfather, and my last name is from my Dad&#8217;s Dad (and so on ad infinitum).\u00a0 For many years &#8211; decades even &#8211; this didn&#8217;t bother me too much. Yeah, I got my Dad&#8217;s mail often; and people frequently remarked that it didn&#8217;t seem &#8220;right&#8221; that I &#8211; the young kid &#8211; went by the authoritative sounding &#8220;James,&#8221; whilst my older father went with the playful sounding &#8220;Jim.&#8221; But all in all, I liked being named after my Dad.<\/p>\n<p>And I still do. I mean, he&#8217;s a great guy. I have loads of great memories of doing fun things with him. He sat in my room for hours playing <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Solarquest\">Solarquest<\/a> with me. Even as an adult, he&#8217;s been a good friend &#8211; he helped Jennifer and me with vaious problems with our homes and cars, even letting me borrow his car for 5 months once so I could get to college and back. I always admired him for his positive attitude and his ability to be assertive without being a jerk (I can&#8217;t seem to strike that balance). The only time anyone has a lgitimate gripe against him, it isn&#8217;t a big deal. I mean, yeah, my mom was right: if my Dad went off to run a quick errand, it inexplicably took him two hours, primarily because he bumped into a friend and they ended up chatting for 20 minutes, and then he got distracted by a cool new store adjacent to the one he was supposed to go to. But, come on, that&#8217;s hardly a major character flaw. Even as a Witness, my Dad has this nagging feeling that he should be shunning me (&#8217;cause his religion tells him to), but he lets his conscience trump those lame rules.<\/p>\n<p>But then there&#8217;s my grandfather. For years I ingnored the tales of the abuse he handed out to my mom and her siblings. I rationalized by saying: &#8220;Oh well, he&#8217;s a changed man, now.&#8221; and &#8220;I think he feels bad for the way he raised his kids.&#8221; And, you know, he probably does. As the other side of family seemed a little to fond of pointing out: all his kids are messed up because of their father.<\/p>\n<p>For some odd reason, when I was born, my mom decided to honor the man who had been such a strict, ridiculous, and abusive father. She took his first name as my middle name. And, for a long time, I liked that middle name. After all, my grandfather was nice to me. When I&#8217;d hear tales of his former self, I figured we all made mistakes, but that god had forgiven him, and so should I.<\/p>\n<p>Last summer, my grandma was in the hospital, having suffered a heartattack. I called to check on her, and\u00a0she and I \u00a0had a pleasant conversation. I told her I would come visit her soon, and she said that was fine. That afternoon, I made plans with my mom to go visit\u00a0grandma\u00a0that evening. But my mom called back about an hour later, telling me that my grandfather, when asked if it&#8217;d be alright if I come visit, replied: &#8220;Absolutely not.&#8221; He didn&#8217;t want me in his house, see, &#8217;cause I&#8217;m not a member of his religion.<\/p>\n<p>This was like\u00a0 a lightbulb in my brain: Of course he wouldn&#8217;t want anyone\u00a0in his company that doesn&#8217;t subscribe to the Watchtower Society! Because that means I don&#8217;t follow the same corporation that has given him an excuse for his power over the years.\u00a0I&#8217;m not gonna get into that right now, but, needless to say, I pretty much dumped my middle name after that. Jennifer and I spent one evening looking through possible alternative middle names, and I even printed off the government forms for changing my name.\u00a0 Turns out, it&#8217;s a big hassle, and it&#8217;s expensive.<\/p>\n<p>Will I change my\u00a0middle name one day? I hope to. I see no reason to carry on the name of a child abuser who shuns his grandchildren.\u00a0Besides, there are other people who are also named after him, and they can carry on his name if they think he&#8217;s so awesome.<\/p>\n<p>One thing&#8217;s for sure: no child of mine will ever have the first or middle name Daniel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>17 June 2010<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I stopped at the library the other day, and, like a sucker, I went over to the shelf of books-for-sale. I thumbed through them real quick, and spotted Jonathan Safran Foer&#8217;s <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Everything_Is_Illuminated\">Everything is Illuminated<\/a><\/em>. More importantly, it was on audio cassette. This is good, because I love listening to books in the car, but I only have a cassetter player, and there&#8217;s a serious derth of books on cassette these days, unless I want to learn Hmong or learn how to be an empowered manager. So I paid the 50 cents and bought the book-on-tape.<\/p>\n<p>A few years back, I read Foer&#8217;s <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Extremely-Incredibly-Close-Jonathan-Safran\/dp\/0618329706\">Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close<\/a><\/em>, which is probably one of the ten best novels I&#8217;ve ever read. So I have high hopes for this new book I&#8217;ve acquired. I began listening to it the very next morning, and at first I liked it. But yesterday, it shifted scenes to a time, about 200 years earlier, when an overturned wagon in a river causes a big uproar in a little Polish community. I couldn&#8217;t follow it at all. All the characters (and there&#8217;s about 20 introduced in the span of 10 minutes) have similar, difficult-to-understand Hebrew names, and the narrative is laced with Jewish terms I don&#8217;t understand.<\/p>\n<p>As an aside: I hate when authors do that. See, I speak English, and so I read English books. If an author suddenly lapses into French, Spanish, Latin, or Hebrew, I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s going on. Is it to make the author seem intelligent? Of is it to make me pull out a translation dictionary and get me to laboriously decipher the text? Who knows? Who cares?<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, today I tried listening to it some more, but I had the windows rolled down (my car lacks air conditioning) and so it was too loud to hear the tape.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll try again tomorrow. My plan is to rewind the tape to the start of this scene, and try to pay more attention this time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>15 June 2010 Today we attended the child birth class again. At one point, one of the instructors held up a graph. It had the typical X and Y axes, and it had a linearly rising line. She said the name of the graph, which I promptly forgot, but explained that it&#8217;s a plotting of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-656","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-current-events"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/656","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=656"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/656\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":659,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/656\/revisions\/659"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=656"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=656"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=656"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}