{"id":23,"date":"2007-11-09T06:48:00","date_gmt":"2007-11-09T12:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/?p=23"},"modified":"2009-02-18T23:16:34","modified_gmt":"2009-02-19T05:16:34","slug":"my-two-favorite-motion-pictures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/2007\/11\/my-two-favorite-motion-pictures\/","title":{"rendered":"My Two Favorite Motion Pictures"},"content":{"rendered":"

2. Rope (1948)<\/strong>
The first color film directed by Alfred Hitchcock, and one of only two in which he served as producer, Rope<\/em> is a flawlessly executed experiment in film-making. I\u2019ve seen a lot of film \u201cexperiments\u201d, and this stands out above all others in that it not only contains a narrative, but a spellbinding narrative at that.
But getting back to the experiment \u2013 the first thing I ever heard about this film was that it contained no cuts and, therefore, transpires in real time (i.e., during the 80 minutes it takes to watch the film, eighty minutes transpire in the lives of the characters). My initial reaction was: \u201cCool idea, but probably boring\u201d. But I was wrong. Hitchcock experimented with long cuts (e.g., Under Capricorn<\/em>) and confined sets (e.g., Lifeboat<\/em>) on other occasions, but in Rope<\/em>, he uses them both to perfection
For one thing, Rope<\/em> does contain cuts, and part of the fun is spotting the cuts, especially before they happen (it\u2019s fun to see how the furniture and characters have to line up for a cut to be \u201chidden\u201d). For another thing, those 80 minutes take place during sunset, and the skyline out the apartment windows makes for a more interesting film in itself than some Oscar winners I\u2019ve seen.
Then there\u2019s the story. Only Hitchcock would have the bravado (back in \u201948) to put such arrogance on film; wherein two college students kill a third just \u201cto see what it feels like\u201d. It\u2019s the ultimate for-the-hell-of-it act, and these boys justify it by claiming their own superiority over the mass of humanity. That in itself isn\u2019t very satisfying, but throughout the next 79 minutes, we are treated to all manner of rationalizations and arguments that supposedly led to that moment of homicide.
Jimmy Stewart stars in this film, and though he is only one-third of the unholy trinity here, he\u2019s still just as great as always. Did he ever give a bad performance? I don\u2019t think so. Even in so-so movies, he manages to shine above the mediocrity. Incidentally, he\u2019s the only person to star in two films in my top ten. In Rope<\/em>, he\u2019s given the best roll and he gets many of the great lines, including the best one: \u201cDid you think you were God, Brandon?\u201d (It\u2019s better in context.)
And what Hitchcock would be complete without dark humor? His cameo appearance, the double-entendre of snippets of conversations, the decision of where to serve dinner, even the binding used to fasten the stack of books \u2013 all keep a viewer raptly attentive.
In most motion pictures with suspense, the suspense tends to rise and fall in episodic fashion throughout the story, culminating in a grand bit of suspense called the \u201cclimax\u201d. But Rope<\/em> is, yet again, different in this regard; the suspense never falls. While this makes for an exhausting filmic experience, it is fun to feel the suspense mount higher and higher until at last a resolution (of which the viewer is never certain) occurs. With each viewing, I revel in the fun of watching the guests, like pawns, being manipulated by their hosts.
When it comes to well-made and enjoyable motion pictures, it is my opinion that Rope<\/em> stands out as one of the best ever. Maybe even the<\/em> best. Except for\u2026<\/p>\n

1. Psycho (1960)<\/strong>
At last I get to discuss what has been my favorite motion picture for the past 16 years. At the time I first viewed it, I realized that no film more fully enraptured, thrilled, excited and intriqued me quite like Psycho<\/em>. Ever since, I have weighed all subsequent films against this one, and, though some have come close, I just can\u2019t honestly rank any film higher. No other motion picture excels in absolutely every aspect. Psycho<\/em>, in my opinion, is the most perfect film ever created, or, if you prefer: Psycho contains the least amount of stuff I did not like. Even the opening titles are brilliant!
This film stands in contrast to all others for not one, but several reasons. Allow me to delineate the outstanding features of Hitchcock\u2019s pi\u00e8ce de r\u00e9sistance\u2026
1. The entire story itself is totally changed from what it appears to be at the outset. I love when I can\u2019t guess what\u2019s gonna happen next, but this takes it to a whole new level. I\u2019ve never seen a movie devote so much time to throwing a person off the main trail (except maybe The Sound of Music<\/em>).
2. Symbolism! I love symbolism in motion pictures, and Psycho<\/em> has it in full measure. From the opening credits chopping from name to name, to the hanging sickles in the hardware store, to the positioning of the hotel in relation to the house, to the changing color of Crane\u2019s clothing, to the pictures on the wall, to the record on the record player, to the license plate number, to the avian references, to the names of the main characters\u2026symbolism is everywhere here. Heck, Bates\u2019 name alone carries two pieces of symbolism.
3. Dialogue. The often strange, stilted dialogue brings these characters to life. There are so many great lines that, after multiple viewings, serve as hilarious bits of foreshadowing: \u201cWe all go a little mad sometimes, haven\u2019t you?\u201d, \u201cA son is a poor substitute for a lover\u201d, \u201c12 rooms, 12 vacancies\u201d, \u201cWe’re always quickest to doubt people who have a reputation for being honest\u201d, \u201cMother\u2019s not quite herself today\u201d, and so on\u2026
4. The music. There are only a handful of movies in which I even notice the music (I\u2019m excluding musicals here, obviously). Star Wars<\/em>, Jaws<\/em>, Vertigo<\/em>, The Godfather <\/em>and The Third Man <\/em>are all examples of non-musicals in which the music is first rate. Psycho<\/em>, with its screeching violins sans percussion, easily makes this list.
5. The acting. No one here does a bad job, and a few actors do so well, I wonder if they were born to play the part. Anthony Perkins is primary in this regard, but, to a lesser extent, so are Vera Miles, Martin Balsam and Mort Mills.
6. The camera work. I know I\u2019ve droned on about the camera work in other films here, so let\u2019s just say that Psycho\u2019s is pretty darn good, too. My favorite pieces are probably the opening shot where the camera goes through the blinds, allowing us to peek in on the lovers, and the sweeping track up the stairs to the Bates\u2019 house.
7. The calendar. It\u2019s weird, I know, but I tend to get preoccupied with the flow of time in movies. Just the other day, I was commenting on the appearant time inconsistency in Mary Poppins<\/em>. Not only is time given it\u2019s due in this movie, it\u2019s scrupulously attended to; the date at the outset cues us in to the appearance of Xmas decorations in the summer, and the wall calendar at the end shows us a passage of nine days \u2013 all logically accounted for.
8. The climax. While other movies have more sweeping climaxes, Psycho\u2019s<\/em> was totally unexpected. Other movies on this list, such as Return of the Jedi<\/em>, Back to the Future<\/em>, Rear Window<\/em>, Ingen Numsil <\/em>and The Princess Bride <\/em>all have very satisfying climaxes, but in those cases, I probably could have guessed how it was going finish. The fun of those movies was just watching how the climax would play out. With Psycho, I had not idea what the climax would be, much less how it would play out. This was largely due to\u2026
9. The twist. I love a film with a secret. Again, other movies reveal great secrets: The Usual Suspects<\/em>, The Empire Strikes Ba<\/em>ck, Citizen Kane<\/em>, Fight Club <\/em>(to name a few) but in every one of those examples, the story is not fundamentally altered by the revelation, it\u2019s more of a clever trick, leaving the viewer saying: \u201cOh, that\u2019s so cool!\u201d \u2026and then rolling the credits. In Psycho<\/em>, the twist\u2019s revelation forces one to go back and rethink the entire film (okay, I guess Fight Club <\/em>is sort of like that, but that movie didn\u2019t have near as great a story).
10. The Denouement. Critics often lambaste Psycho\u2019s<\/em> denouement as unnecessary at best, stupid at worst. I find the therapist\u2019s breakdown of his conversation with Bates to be most fascinating, particularly in how he so causally dismisses the money (that we had cared about so much!) and insists that it was Bates\u2019 mother who told him the truth. But it gets even better: the film then cuts to Bates\u2019 mother thanking the guard for the blanket, and then we hear her disdain for her dutiful son, and her assurance that she would not even hurt a fly (and, indeed, she doesn\u2019t). Finally, in a triple-exposure<\/em>, Bates wryly grins for the camera, as if he is coming for us next, which ever-so-briefly fades to a skull and then a chain pulling out his heart. Finally, the car in the swamp, which we realize was only there to dupe us.
Allow me, too, to mention one other thing. Although this does not affect the quality of the movie at all, I find it funny that Psycho<\/em> originally was not rated, then was rated Approved, then M, then PG, and currently resides at R. I grew up in a religion where people believed all movies rated R were violent, immoral, foul piles of crap\u2026and I had lots of fun asking them about this movie. Many who saw it in the sixties and seventies felt ashamed that they saw (what became) a rated-R movie. I would usually explain this to them following a conversation wherein we extolled the virtues of this wonderful bit of celluloid.
…Whew! All that I never even mentioned the infamous shower scene.
My list is constantly changing (in fact, I\u2019ve altered it since I began posting here). This is just a snapshot of my motion picture preferences on this day. But Psycho<\/em>? Psycho<\/em> has withstood the test of time in my books. Though I am always on the lookout, I would be very surprised to find a film I consider superior. Surprised, but also delighted!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

2. Rope (1948) The first color film directed by Alfred Hitchcock, and one of only two in which he served as producer, Rope is a flawlessly executed experiment in film-making. I\u2019ve seen a lot of film \u201cexperiments\u201d, and this stands out above all others in that it not only contains a narrative, but a spellbinding […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books-film-tv"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23\/revisions\/100"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zimmerscope.com\/Verbisaurus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}