Monthly Archives: July 2011

Who’s Up For Signing the Family Leader Pledge?

Friday, 08 July 2011

Have you ever heard of the Iowa-based group FAMiLY Leader? Yeah, me either. Don’t worry, it’s not important.

However (you knew that was coming, didn’t you?), yesterday they released a document that they would like to have Presidential candidates sign. They are claiming that candidates need to sign this document if they wish to secure future endorsements from certain organizations.

HERE IS THE DOCUMENT.

You can read it if you want. It’s a boring pdf, though, so I’ll just highlight a few things. First, the document puts for a 14-point pledge titled “The Marriage Vow – A Declaration of Dependence Upon Marriage and Family,” so even without reading any further, you already know it’s going to be homophobic and filled with scriptures. They begin by saying they want to ensure certain Jewish and Christian rights, such as gender equality. Because, of course, nothing says “gender equality” like the bible. To prove their point, they footnote three scriptures, including Genesis 2:25, where we read, “The man and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.”

They claim this pledge is needed because divorce rates keep going up, and children often suffer the brunt of these fissions. They note that lots of babies are born out of wedlock each year. Oh – and they also claim they wish to stem the tide of the “debasement of marriage,” including a popular bias that posits homosexual behavior optimizes individual health. I’m not sure where they go that one from – does anyone know of any source that claims that, in order to optimize your health, you need to behave gay?

Anyway, the pledge has 14 points, all footnoted. The only two I can really get behind are points 1, 2 and 5. But since I already pledged point #1 on my wedding day, I see no point in re-asserting it now. Point #2 also seems decent, but it’s a bit vague. There are some marriages that I wish did not happen. There are people who got divorced, and I’m glad they did (my parents are primary examples). So was I not respecting their union? I don’t know. Or maybe the point is just intended to get me to pledge that I won’t sleep with anyone else’s spouse. But since I already agreed to point #1, then this is also redundant.

Regarding point #5: sounds good to me. This is why we should legalize gay marriage.

I’d like to agree with point #3, that all judges be faithful to the Constitution but, again, this is a bit vague. Obviously the Constitution is not perfect, and the authors knew this by allowing for methods of amendment. So I think it’s fine if judges respect and are faithful to the Constitution, yet also feel that it is incomplete or fuzzy in certain areas. The footnotes clears up the meaning by noting that some judges have rejected heterosexuality (what? who?) and that Iowa voters have rejected three such judges (at the insistence of FAMiLY Leader’s leader, no less). It also says some judges are trying to interpret the Constitution to mean that gays can have equal rights, too which, in contradiction to their preamble, is not something FAMiLY Leader wants. Clearly, the Founding Fathers did not want same-sex marriage, just as they did not want women to vote or black people and Indians to count as citizens. Ahh…the good old days.

Regarding the last seven points… Rejecting all forms of pornography and prostitution? Again, this violates the documents preamble of human rights: If two people consent to sex provided one of them pays the other, then I see no problem. And pornography is free speech, man. How would we ban “all forms” of it, anyways? Is any movie with a nude scene considered a porno? I think Tim Pawlenty’s face constitutes a form of pornography, so… would he be banned from appearing in public without a burka? Oh – that brings me to…

Rejection of Sharia Law…I agree with that one, because I oppose all theocracies. However, we don’t live under Sharia Law here in America, so I’m not sure why I would need to agree to this. Shouldn’t I also state that I disagree with the Chinese system of government, and the Cuban one, and Libya’s, and Rwandas…

That last point sounds good on the surface, but it’s couched in such loaded language (anyone who tries to keep state and church separate is “undermining” and showing “intolerance”) that I could not sign it without suspecting ulterior motives. It incites a persecution complex; a tactic I’ve seen all too often in my time.

Fun fact: Michele Bachmann signed the pledge today.

God Exists Because He is Not Alive

Thursday, 07 July 2011

First, grades for the summer semester were posted today. On my final project, the professor gave me a perfect score and wrote:

“James, Wow–this is a very strong, theoretically-sophisticated and well-developed analysis. While a couple of points could be reinforced and a couple of transitions could be further strengthened, this is, overall, very impressive work.

I received an A in the Women and Literature class, scoring 99 out of the 100 points available (I got *only* 4.5 out of 5 points on the first two assignments).

Second, I made a few new quizzes over at Sporcle. So go there and play them. And, if you are a registered user there, be sure to rate my quizzes. And if you’re not a registered user there, what’s your problem?

First quiz: Who’s had a #1 song? Part 1

Second quiz: Who’s had a #1 song? Part 2

Third quiz: Who was President longer?

Third, I get plenty of comments on my YouTube videos, especially the ones that concern the Watchtower Society. Many of them are complimentary, or they offer some sort of criticism. Of course, some of them are Witnesses railing against me – some just call me names or accuse me of being wicked, others say that I made a poor argument in one area or another. All in all, those comments are very predictable.

But two weeks ago, I received what might be the most bizarre argument put forth by any Witness apologist on any of my videos – he (or she – I can’t tell with a user name like “pussylumpessru”) claimed that my video Using Our Power of Reason uses faulty logic because (are you ready for this?) God is not alive.

Here’s his first comment:

“where did God come from?”

-God isn’t life, therefore he does not need to have prexisting life to exist. he GIVES life, life is something that requires cells, and can die. God cannot die because he is not alive, because he is not made of cells.

-Think of numbers, how they never end or start, the same thing with the existence of God. It had to beginning.

So then I replied:

“God isn’t life”

…I agree!

So then pussylumpessru said:

go away.

Ahh, such a typical Witness response; they make their argument and then, if I respond in a way that is anything other than, “Oh my, you are sooo right, I guess I’ll start going back to the meetings tomorrow,” then they just run away, possibly leaving a stupid quip like “go away” in their wake.

Fortunately, I’ve learned how to rope them back in to further discussion. The trick is to simply point out that I know they are scared to talk to me because they’ve been instructed not too. So here’ s what I said to pussylumpessru:

I know how you feel. When I was a Witness, it disturbed me greatly that there were people who held contrary beliefs. I too wished they would just “go away.” The WT Society does a great job of demonizing those people and convincing their members to cut off any contact with them. It’s sad, but when a belief structure is held up so tenuously, they must shun all dissenting opinions or risk losing members. I hope you have the courage to leave one day.

In another typical Witness maneuver, pussylumpessru dodges the topic at hand and moves on to a different topic. In this case, the one that he/she first aired. He/she responded thusly:

but i took away half the meaning of your video. I don’t understand why you still behave as if you’re right..

This was somewhat baffling to me, so I said:

I’m not sure where you “took away half the meaning” of the video, nor where I am behaving as if I’m right. My argument is that God is more complicated than a cell, and your tired apologetics don’t disprove that. Besides, the video was intended to show many of the errors in the brochure – so even if I am wrong in my assumption that the JWs believe their god to be more complicated than a cell, the other arguments still stand.

pussylumpessru did write back, but he/she sent me a private message (likely due to feeling guilty for talking with an ex-Witness so extensively). It read:

you stated in video “Where did God come from? If the society claims life can come from preexisting life, surely somebody created God.” Life is something that can reproduce, grow, and adapt to the environment. The most simple form of life is a cell. God does not grow, can’t reproduce because he does not have sperm cells, adapt to the environment, he does not have a digestive system, a liver, or bones. By definition, God is NOT life. So- going back to the “preexisting life has to come from other life” can’t apply to God because he is not life to begin with. He is not made of cells.

Wow. How insane is that? Essentially, he/she is arguing that we can have confidence God exists because He isn’t alive. Man, I didn’t even know where to begin with this one. I have never, ever heard this rationale espoused by any Witness or in any Watchtower publication ever. Here’s my response:

This seems funny to me, in that you are arguing that my video holds little merit since god “isn’t life.” In my decades as a Jehovah’s Witness, I never once heard any of my fellow believers make this claim. In fact, it’s hard for me to see how any sincere theist would ever make this claim unless they were trying to win an argument using linguistic backflips.
Your definition of life is an odd one. For one thing, I don’t think the ability to ejaculate sperm cells should count as a defining aspect of life. Many organisms reproduce without ever manufacturing a single sperm (my wife, for example). Binary fission, budding, spore formation, and parthenogenesis also come to mind. Additionally, I know of several people who are unable to reproduce who would be quite hurt to learn they do not fit your definition of life. The bible claims God has the ability to create life, and surely this — especially angelic beings — one of whom he calls his first-born son — counts as a form of reproduction. And while the Witnesses god may not have a digestive system, liver, or bones (I’m not sure how you know this), neither does most life on our planet, either.
Here’s another definition of life, found in my Webster’s Dictionary: ” 1) the quality that distinguishes a vital and functional being from a dead body; 2) a principle or force that is considered to underlie the distinctive quality of animate beings.” …So is the god of the bible alive, or is he dead? Is he animate, or inanimate?
If theists (and Witnesses in particular) now hold to the idea that god is not life, then my assertion still holds. Since the Watchtower Society claims that life can only come from pre-existing life, then god (who, according to you, is “NOT life”) could not have created life, because then life would have come from NOT life, and this violates the Watchtower’s teaching.
Of course, you are free to hold to whatever definition of life you prefer and if you feel that excludes deities, then that’s just fine. As I implied in my first paragraph, however, my video still makes a valid point in that my main argument is that Witnesses believe god is more complicated than a cell. Whether or not god has sperm or bones or even cells is beside the point. I think nearly all Witnesses — present company excepted, of course — would agree with this assertion. Additionally, they would also firmly assert that their god is alive, a belief they would no doubt back up by referencing their favorite book…
-“As Jehovah lives, if you had preserved them alive, I would not have to kill you.” (Judges 8:19)
-“For as Jehovah, who is the Deliverer of Israel, is alive, even if it is in Jonathan my son, yet he will positively die.” (1 Samuel 14: 39)
-“As Jehovah is alive, not as much as a single hair of his head will fall to the earth.” (1 Samuel 14:45)
-“Immediately Saul swore to her by Jehovah, saying: ‘As Jehovah is alive, guilt for error will not befall you in this matter!'” (1 Samuel 28:10)
-“‘Therefore, as I am alive,'” is the utterance of Jehovah of armies, the God of Israel, ‘Mo´ab herself will become just like Sod´om,'” (Zephaniah 2:9)
-“As Jehovah is alive in truth, in justice and in righteousness!’ then in him the nations will actually bless themselves” (Jeremiah 4:2)
-“‘As Jehovah is alive!’ just as they taught my people to swear by Ba´al,” (Jeremiah 12:16)
-“‘Therefore as I am alive,’ is the utterance of the Sovereign Lord Jehovah” (Ezekiel 5:11)
-“‘as I am alive,’ is the utterance of the Sovereign Lord Jehovah” (Ezekiel 14:18)
-“‘as I am alive,’ is the utterance of the Sovereign Lord Jehovah” (Ezekiel 14:20)
-“‘As I am alive,’ is the utterance of the Sovereign Lord Jehovah” (Ezekiel 16:48)
-“‘As I am alive,” is the utterance of the Sovereign Lord Jehovah,” (Ezekiel 17:16)
-“Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord Jehovah has said: ‘As I am alive, surely my oath that he has despised'” (Ezekiel 17:19)
-“‘As I am alive,’ is the utterance of the Sovereign Lord Jehovah” (Ezekiel 18:3)
-“‘Therefore, as I am alive,’ is the utterance of Jehovah of armies, the God of Israel,” (Zephaniah 2:9)
…I could go on but, being as these are bible quotes, I’m already bored.
The bottom line is, if you think god is not alive, then the two of us can agree on that point. I’ll leave the video up online here for the benefit of the other 6 million Witnesses who do think their god is alive.

I haven’t heard back from pussylumpessru, but it’s only been a few hours. I’ll keep you posted.

The Republic of National American

Tuesday, 05 July 2011

So, I remembered that I had all these things that I wanted to write about Owen. I keep putting it off because, well, none of it is relevant to one specific day – which is the goal of this blog – but then I figured, “eh, who cares?”
About a month ago, I said that Isla was 300 days old. This, of course, prompted my number-crazed son to inquire as to how many days old he was. I told him that would take some calculating. I showed him how I had to multiply his 6 years times 365 days in each one of those years, plus one additional day for when he was two years old. Then we had to add in the days that had passed since his most recent birthday (which had only been about three weeks earlier). When I arrived at the sum, Owen seemed impressed. Jennifer and I moved on to other topics of conversation, but a few minutes later Owen said: “Hey, I was 2,011 days old on my birthday and this year is 2011.” I stopped for a minute to figure the numbers in my head. Then I said something like, “Yeah, you’re right!”
I thought that was a pretty amazing feat. First, he had to subtract the correct number of days to arrive at his birthday. Then, once he realized he was 2,011 days old that day, he had to make the connection that his age (in years) matched the year number. Pretty impressive.
Of course, I should mention that my calculation was wrong – later tallying revealed him to be well past 2,011 days old. Still, Owen’s math was right.

Around the time when Owen finished Kindergarten, I asked him if he remembered last year, when he graduated from preschool. He said he did remember that. We talked about it for a while, and then he asked why he had to wear “that funny hat.” I explained that it’s called a graduation cap, and it’s a tradition for people to wear that cap on the day they finish high school or college. I told him his preschool class was mimicking those traditions. “Oh,” he said, “I thought you only had to wear those hats if you were from a certain country.”
This completely baffled me, so I asked, “What country are you talking about?”
He said, “I don’t know. It’s like, National American something.”
I started laughing. Owen had no idea what was so funny, but I kept on laughing. Finally, I said, “Do you mean National American University?”
Yes, that was what he meant. Having seen some daytime commercials lately (now that school is out), Owen has come across those danceable National American University commercials. Those commercials include scenes of students wearing said caps. Not familiar with the word “University,” Owen just took the two words he does know (“National” and “American”) and just assumed this was a commercial inviting people to come visit that great country of National American. Provided, of course, they wear the right hat.

I bought Owen the book Volcanoes and Earthquakes. Big mistake. While he enjoys learning about the science of plate tectonics and the Earth’s crust, he is mortified at the extent of human suffering from these natural causes. On one page, he saw what looked like casts of human corpses. He asked me if those were real people or if it was just an artist’s rendition of what it would look like if people died from a volcano. I looked at the page and saw it was discussing the excavating of Pompeii. I told him that the bodies had long since decomposed, but that the rock had hardened around them and presevered their poses at the moment of death.

Ooops.

Owen immediately pointed to the figure of a dead child and began crying. Jennifer and I tried to explain to him that we don’t live anywhere near a volcano and that, with modern technology, experts can often predict when and where a volcano is likely to erupt and people who do live nearby can head for safety. This, of course, doesn’t mitigate the past suffering, and Owen asked, “Why do people who are pregnant move to where there are volcanoes?” I tried to explain that those people probably lived there their whole lives and might have had no idea when or where volcanoes went off.

Owen has really gotten a soft spot in his heart for babies and young children ever since Isla has been born. I think, seeing her, he realizes how vulnerable to just about everything (even themselves – Isla would probably choke on carpet lint within hours if left to her own vices).

If you want to read more about our kids, check out my wife’s latest blog post: CLICK THIS! (Fun fact: If I try to click on this link while at work, I get transferred to a Websense page telling me the site is blocked due to sexual content.)

Wednesday, 06 July 2011

As noted previously, my bondage to AT&T expired near the end of last month. After two years, it was time to move on from AT & shitTy. I called up their ‘customer service’ hotline last week, just to verify that my bondage was concluding. When the woman on the other line learned that I planned to jump ship and move on to a competitor as soon as possible, she began offering me all sorts of things: She’d let me upgrade to a new phone at no extra charge, she’d waive some stupid fee, she’d allow me to have a longer trial period for my next AT&T phone.

“Yes, yes,” I told her, “That’s all very nice, but you’re only saying that stuff now that I have the power to go elsewhere. When I was under contract, you were unwilling to do those things. So, back then, I told your reps that as soon as the contract expired, I would move on. So that’s what I’m doing now.”

She apologized for their past actions, but I told her that was too little, too late. I explained that her company claims to have a 100% customer satisfaction guarantee, but that I was never satisfied and they never cared. Therefore, they are lying when they say they strive for 100% customer satisfaction and I don’t wish to continue doing business with a company that lies. She said something about other companies being more expensive, but I pointed out that all other companies have something going for them that’s more important than money: They’re not AT&T.

Anyway, I planned to reactivate my old Verizon phone, which I kept stored in a box under my bed these two years. However, the head of the house said it would be more cost-effective to get on her parents plan. I could visit the Sprint store where her sister works, she explained, and get a phone from someone I know and then just pay my in-laws ten bucks a month to hop on their plan.

Fine.

So now I have a Samsung phone. I hate the brand name “Samsung,” because everytime – EVERYTIME! – I see or hear that name I think of Neil Diamond’s “Song Sung Blue,” and I do not need Mr. Diamond coming into my brain every day.

Today I got a call from an impersonal Sprint HAL-9000, that asked me all sorts of questions about my visit and purchase. Of course, I gave high marks all around (since my sister-in-law’s reimbursement is influenced by such surveys). It seemed a bit silly to give a ‘5’ (Very Satisfied) to questions like, “How satisfied were you with the lay out of the store?” After all, I don’t fucking care about a phone store’s layout. In fact, it looked just like a typical suburban, bland waste of space…like every store I’ve ever worked at (and nearly everyone I’ve visited, too). But, you know, I was trying to be charitable.

Here’s what I like about my new phone:

-It’s not AT&T

-It takes pictures

-The screen stays on while I’m talking so I can see if I’ve lost connection

-I can edit my contact names, so people like Rpbertb can be easily edited to Roberta without having to enter in a new entry

-Contacts can hold more than one phone number, so I don’t have to have people listed two and three times anymore

-It’s a flip-phone. This is important because flat phones (like my wife’s iPhone) would just be ruined in my pocket, and slide-open phones slide open in my pockets and gobble up lint.

Here’s what I don’t like:

-It’s a little wider and longer than my Verizon phone. Not by much – maybe a quarter inch in both ways – but it makes a difference. It’s not as comfortable to hold when I’m talking. More importantly, it takes up more space in my pockets. When I sit down, if it teeters on top of my leg, it’s just fine. But if it slides out to the left (I keep it in my left pocket), then it’s more likely to just slide right out or at least tug on the pocket. If it slides to the right…um…well let’s just say I keep other things in between my legs and so a phone is competing for space with other, um, packages.

-It has a screen on the front. Yeah, I don’t like this. If I want the use the phone, I’ll flip it open. A screen on the outside is just asking to be scratched or broken, especially since I keep my keys in the same pocket. (And, no, I can not keep my keys in a different pocket!) My wife suggested putting duct tape over the screen, which I may do eventually, but in the meantime, I’ll just allow that stupid, pointless screen to exist for however brief it’s life may be. Once I crack/break/chip it, then I’ll cover it with duct tape.

-The brand name on the outside reminds me of Neil Diamond. And, in fact, I listened to the entire song while typing this blog post. Damn.

Fireworks

Saturday, 02 July 2011

So here is one of the most interesting blog posts I’ve read in a while. In it, Greg Laden (who has Harvard degrees in Archaeology and Biology) writes about the difference between evolution and origin-of-life sciences. This was of particular interest to me because in at least one video I’ve made recently, I imply a difference between the start of life and the development of life since that point.

Of course, as Dr. Laden points out, the distinction is arbitrary because, well, we don’t know exactly when life began or when, precisely, ‘things’ went from being non-living to living. The comments associated with his post bear this pout better, but a valuable reason for splitting evolution up into these two domains is when responding to Christians (which is exactly what I’m doing in those videos). Christians, of course, like to claim that their god started life. A subset of those Christians also claim that species have not diversified from that point, but were each created, immutably, in current form directly from their god.

On the first point (god started the ball rolling), I don’t really have any qualms. I mean, I see no evidence for the idea that a deity lighted the spark, but there’s no hard-core evidence regarding life’s moment of commencement. Again, this would be tough to pinpoint even if we could hop in our Delorean and go back in time, becuase a lot hinges on what, exactly, makes something alive. So, it’s likely we’ll never know when and where life started (although there are a few good theories that are a lot better than ‘according to Genesis…’).

However, only a buffoon would deny that species change, via natural selection and mutation, over time. To me, this is the evolution that is undeniable. Even if a god – especially the Jehovah variety – revealed himself to us humans tomorrow, evolution would still be a fact. He (or she) might say, “Yeah, I’m the one who created life,” but evolution would still have happened and be happening. The only way to not accept this is to be sheltered from a real understanding of evolution, which is what many Christian religions strive to accomplish.

Sunday, 03 July 2011

Though we are trying diligently to save money this weekend, we ventured over to IKEA for lunch. They have a special going on this weekend in which kids get to eat free. You don’t even have to buy an adult meal! This was readily apparent when, upon arriving at their dining area, I noticed a table of ten people: two adults and eight children.

Anyway, Jennifer and I did buy lunch for ourselves, but we also scored a free lunch for our spawn. I think this marks the first time we’ve ever purchased a restaurant meal for Isla. She didn’t eat all of her meal, of course, so we packaged up the rest and took it home.

We also let Owen play in the play area for 45 minutes. Parents can just drop their kids off and go shopping. Well, we didn’t shop – we just sort of wandered around the store – but it was still relaxing to have Mr. Nervous Energy off playing somewhere else for a while.

Also today: Owen and I whipped up a batch of sun tea:

I know it looks really appetizing here, but I made it too weak. One way I’m gonna solve that problem is by preparing sun tea in smaller containers from now on. This appears to be safer from a health standpoint, too.

Monday, 04 July 2011

In an effort to stem our yearly tradition of lame-ass fourth of July observances, my wife made arrangements for us to hook up with some friends in Stillwater this evening.

The parking was terrible! I think everyone in Minnesota descended on Stillwater. I dropped my wife and kids off right at the restaurant where we were to meet with our friends (Brine’s – which is just about the only place in downtown Stillwater to have a decent meal), then drove off looking for parking. My usual spots were all taken, so I just ended up driving around. I passed on the opportunity to park in one lot for $10, then circled out of town and came back in on one of those ridiculously steep streets. Ten more minutes passed and then I found a spot – at 45 degrees – about four blocks form the restaurant, so I parked there.

Anyway, apart from that, the day was pretty great. We walked around Stillwater, bought some tickets for our kids to play on the inflatable sliding/jumping things and then hunkered down right on the shore of a very flooded St. Croix River. At 10:00 sharp, and to strains of Also Sprach Zarathustra, the fireworks began. With the sun down and a cool breeze coming off the water, the weather was perfect. She fireworks were the best I’d seen in a while (it certainly helped being right at ground zero. Isla thought they were amazing, as was evident from her incessant clapping and pointing. At about 10:15, she turned to Jennifer and decided to start nursing and, despite the noise, the lights, and the crowds, she fell asleep. Owen was disappointed when the fanfare was over, but like a good trooper, he climbed the mountain back to our car and, along with his sister, slept for the ride home.

Also today – I posted this video from March 1992. It features my friend Rhett, who passed away six years ago today. Have a look:

Listen To God and Live Forever

Friday, 01 July 2011

It’s that time of year again: time for the annual conventions of Jehovah’s Witnesses. The conventions scheduled for here in the midwest will be taking place in Rochester (again) starting today. But let’s face it, attending those conventions is a drain on your vacation time, wallet, psyche, and reasoning abilities. Still, you are eager to find out what new “food” the “faithful and discreet slave” plans to provide “in the proper time” (HINT: not hoagies). So I’m here to help.

There are actually two brochures scheduled to be released at the conventions; both are titled Listen to God and Live Forever – one is a ‘standard’ issue brochure, and the other is a ‘simplified’ version. Below are some highlights of the new brochures. Here’s a fun game: try to figure out if the images displayed are from the standard brochure or the simplified version…

Here’s an image and the accompanying caption from page two. I don’t have much to say about it except that, well, this pretty much sets the tone for the whole brochure. Notice: God teaches people EVERYWHERE. Yep, even the billions of people who do not worship the god of the bible. They don’t say it here, but the Witnesses god also teaches people the best way to die, too (refuse a blood transfusion).

Here’s a picture from page nine. I like that Satan looks like such a bad ass. I mean, he’s not the typical horned, hoofed red guy we usually see. Instead, he looks like James Coburn. Which is awesome.

Why do humans die? Simple: ‘Cause they’re related to Adam and Eve. Also, the dead can’t see or hear OR DO ANYTHING. It says so right here on page 11.

Page 11 also has this gem: Jehovah did not mean for people to die. Honest, it was an accident. He didn’t want it to happen and since he’s not, you know, all-powerful or all-knowing or anything, there wasn’t anything he could do about it.

YES! I love it when the Watchtower Society talks about the flood. It’s so cute. Notice: Noah brought into the ark “every sort of animal” (page 13). Geez, think of the tanks he must’ve built for the whales and sharks. And plesiosaurs.

On page 14, we learn that ALL the WICKED people died. Though it’s tough to see in my scan of the image, this included children. Those wicked, wicked children. It did not, however, include the angels who adopted human form. They’re not people, evidently.

Here’s an image from page 15. I have a better idea for a caption: “Some people are like Noah. They think all the world’s animals can fit in a single boat and that plants can survive a year-long deluge; they are Jehovah’s Witnesses.”

Also on page 15: More wicked people. This includes people who slow dance and use ridiculous gestures when giving speeches.

Page 25: I agree – You can pray about food, employment, shelter, clothing, and health. But damned if it will do any good. Like the time I prayed to Jehovah to help me find employment that would allow me to keep pioneering. He said no.

Page 26: The bad news is, Jehovah’s Witnesses are taught to be homophobes. The good news is, they’re also told not to vote. So don’t worry, Minnesota, we won’t have to worry about them next November.

I just had to include this image from page 26. This is exactly what our home looks like the moment I get home from work.

Page 27 tells us sex outside the marriage is wrong. As you can see, this man has left his big-busted, red-haired, tight-assed wife for a frumpy hag. Bad move. Jehovah will kill you. Even though he doesn’t mean for people to die. Also, it appears that polyandry is just fine.

Page 28: Raging homophobia, part II. This is especially relevant because all the gays that work at the Watchtower Society can finally get married.

Page 31: Nothing draws a person closer to god than hanging out with Witnesses. I know I never felt closer to His presence than when Mike Lewis was condemning me for contemplating using a “just married” sign on our car at our wedding.

Here’s an image from the back cover. Have I mentioned how awesome it is that Satan is depicted as such a bad ass?

There you have it. Save yourself the trouble of attending the convention. This is all you need to know. If it’s too late to cancel your hotel arrangements, I suggest you attend the Pride Fest, instead.

Oh – and have you figured out if these excerpts are from the standard brochure or the simplified version? Come on, just the fact that I asked should clue you in to the answer.